![]() “But our measures indicated that a child had low self-control only if the scores from different reporters and on different occasions all added up and pointed in the same direction.” “All children have varying attention spans, and all get frustrated now and then,” she says. Moffitt and her colleagues measured children’s self control on numerous occasions, getting behavior ratings from parents and teachers as well as from research staff who worked with the children. As in the current research, the kids with more self-control in the marshmallow trial had better life outcomes across the board.įor the new study, the “Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study” whose results were published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers led by Duke University psychologist Terrie Moffit followed 1,000 children in New Zealand for more than three decades. About one-third of the 4-to-6-year-olds studied were able to withstand the sweet temptation. The new research confirms the findings of the famous Stanford marshmallow study, which found that young children who were able resist grabbing a fluffy marshmallow placed in front of them - for 15 long minutes - in order to get two of them later scored an average of 210 points higher on the SAT than kids who couldn’t wait. This is taken from data from what is probably the best long-term study in our field.” (Disclosure: Perry and I have written two books together.) Bruce Perry, professor of psychiatry at Northwestern University, agrees: “It’s a very cool study. ( More on : The Tiger Nanny: The Missing Link in the Parenting Debate)ĭr. “It highlights how incredibly important self-control is.” “This is a great study, mining a huge trove of data to tease apart the relationships among some really important factors that can determine the direction of our lives,” says Martha Farah, director of the Center for Neuroscience and Society at the University of Pennsylvania. Kids who scored low on such measures - for instance, becoming easily frustrated, lacking persistence in reaching goals or performing tasks, or having difficulty waiting their turn in line - were roughly three times more likely to wind up as poor, addicted, single parents or to have multiple health problems as adults, compared with children who behaved more conscientiously as early as age 3. ![]() Problems surfacing in adolescence, such as becoming a smoker or getting pregnant, accounted for about half of the bad outcomes associated with low self-control in childhood. Follow may be the secret to success, according to a persuasive new study that followed 1,000 children from birth to age 32: children who showed early signs of self-mastery were not only less likely to have developed addictions or committed a crime by adulthood, but were also healthier and wealthier than their more impulsive peers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |